Our global ecosystem is getting hotter, as well as people who always working to find out how to stop and how to adapt the changing climate. There are people who stand to criticize on how the issue of global warming is getting louder and gain more political attentions throughout the world.
You may find some global warming pessimist readings in your most-favorite book shop –one of them is written by Christopher Booker, an UK journalist.
The authors of best selling Freakonomics confidently entering global debate on climate change with its controversy ideas. SuperFreakonomics has been responded in many ways, mostly criticizing. Some of you may find critics which are circulating through online media. They even called as “staggeringly illogical” to refer a statement within SuperFreakonomics.
Levitt and Dubner, might be excellent in the area of popular economics–explaining daily events and providing easy understanding to most people who never study economics. But, why in the SuperFreakonomics, the author take contrary side with mainstream understanding of global warming?
