<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>iip albanjary &#187; Climate Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iipalbanjary.net/tag/climate-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iipalbanjary.net</link>
	<description>a simple note on popular technologies, smart business ideas &#38; fab greening issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 04:55:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Climategate: even skeptics win, deforestation still happen</title>
		<link>http://iipalbanjary.net/climategate-even-skeptics-win-deforestation-still-happen/</link>
		<comments>http://iipalbanjary.net/climategate-even-skeptics-win-deforestation-still-happen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Forest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climategate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gucci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H&M Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office depot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAK 2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulp and paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iipalbanjary.net/?p=1377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Climategate could be the hottest climate debate which will undermine the global effort of earth cooling. Climate skeptics may not believe on man-made global warming, thus buzzing scientist&#8217;s hacked email emphasizing the poor quality of scientific works that was done. Will Climategate attract more politicians, activists and campaigners in the Copenhagen meeting? Wait, climategate is  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://iipalbanjary.net/climategate-even-skeptics-win-deforestation-still-happen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global warming disaster by Booker</title>
		<link>http://iipalbanjary.net/global-warming-disaster-by-booker/</link>
		<comments>http://iipalbanjary.net/global-warming-disaster-by-booker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Booker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kilimanjaro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iipalbanjary.net/?p=1360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our global ecosystem is getting hotter, as well as people who always working to find out how to stop and how to adapt the changing climate. There are people who stand to criticize on how the issue of global warming is getting louder and gain more political attentions throughout the world. You may find some [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://iipalbanjary.net/global-warming-disaster-by-booker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indonesia to make 26pct cut in carbon emission</title>
		<link>http://iipalbanjary.net/indonesia-to-make-26pct-cut-in-carbon-emission/</link>
		<comments>http://iipalbanjary.net/indonesia-to-make-26pct-cut-in-carbon-emission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geothermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peat land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iipalbanjary.net/?p=1315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the G20&#8242;s last summit, Indonesia announced decision to lower carbon emission level voluntarily. The target of 26 percent decrease, as explained by the Deputy III for Improving Conservation of natural resources and Environmental Degradation Control Environment, Masnellyarti Hilman &#8211;was based on calculations of emission reduction from mixed energy and renewable energy including geothermal energy, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://iipalbanjary.net/indonesia-to-make-26pct-cut-in-carbon-emission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SuperFreakonomics: not very super on global warming ideas</title>
		<link>http://iipalbanjary.net/superfreakonomics-not-very-super-on-global-warming-ideas/</link>
		<comments>http://iipalbanjary.net/superfreakonomics-not-very-super-on-global-warming-ideas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freakonomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global cooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iipalbanjary.net/?p=1274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The authors of best selling Freakonomics confidently entering global debate on climate change with its controversy ideas. SuperFreakonomics has been responded in many ways, mostly criticizing. Some of you may find critics which are circulating through online media. They even called as &#8220;staggeringly illogical&#8221; to refer a statement within SuperFreakonomics. Levitt and Dubner, might be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://iipalbanjary.net/superfreakonomics-not-very-super-on-global-warming-ideas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Road to Copenhagen: In search of certainty</title>
		<link>http://iipalbanjary.net/road-to-copenhagen-in-search-of-certainty/</link>
		<comments>http://iipalbanjary.net/road-to-copenhagen-in-search-of-certainty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deforestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developing country]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REDD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iipalbanjary.net/?p=1266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reading a recent article of NY Times on global climate deal, I noted that more uncertainty is raising and shown by industrial countries.  It seems that they try to present good message to global society, and agree to do something for tackling global warming. However, until now their messages are lack of delivering clear and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://iipalbanjary.net/road-to-copenhagen-in-search-of-certainty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate change effect on drought</title>
		<link>http://iipalbanjary.net/climate-change-effect-on-drought/</link>
		<comments>http://iipalbanjary.net/climate-change-effect-on-drought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iipalbanjary.net/?p=1212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent prove of climate change effect has been revealed by experts, who explaining a link connecting rising level of greenhouse gases with a decline in rainfall.  It has confirmed that the drought is not just a natural dry stretch but a shift related to climate change. How did experts prove the link? Sunday Morning [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://iipalbanjary.net/climate-change-effect-on-drought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 facts and findings about REDD</title>
		<link>http://iipalbanjary.net/7-facts-and-findings-about-redd/</link>
		<comments>http://iipalbanjary.net/7-facts-and-findings-about-redd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Forest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deforestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote sensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNFCCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iipalbanjary.net/?p=1187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reduced emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) is one of recent global mechanisms that expected by developing countries to help in conserving forests, combat climate change as well as eradicate poverty.  Public may aware on deforestation and its impact on climate change. But, halting the deforestation process isn&#8217;t simply as people reducing plastic consumption. Scientists, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://iipalbanjary.net/7-facts-and-findings-about-redd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In search of suitable environmental protection: PES and REDD</title>
		<link>http://iipalbanjary.net/in-search-of-suitable-environmental-protection-pes-and-redd/</link>
		<comments>http://iipalbanjary.net/in-search-of-suitable-environmental-protection-pes-and-redd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 04:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Forest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIFOR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deforestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto Protocol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REDD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iipalbanjary.net/?p=1132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;re always ways to achieve better life and we need to struggle to achieve it Now I&#8217;m highlighting how people are trying to develop better mechanism to address environmental issues, especially forest protection. I refer to recent hot issues on payment environmental services (PES) and reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD).  Both of them [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://iipalbanjary.net/in-search-of-suitable-environmental-protection-pes-and-redd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investing more resources in climate adaption and mitigation</title>
		<link>http://iipalbanjary.net/investing-more-resources-in-climate-adaption-and-mitigation/</link>
		<comments>http://iipalbanjary.net/investing-more-resources-in-climate-adaption-and-mitigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asian Development Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extreme weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southeast Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildfire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iipalbanjary.net/?p=1124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read a report published by Asian Development Bank (ADB) that emphasizing the impact of climate changes in Southeast Asia. It seems an effort of picturing how climate change issues will change more countries in the region -just like Stern&#8217;s report.  The report urges policy makers to take some actions including investing more resources in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://iipalbanjary.net/investing-more-resources-in-climate-adaption-and-mitigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avoided deforestation: most favorite project of forest carbon offset</title>
		<link>http://iipalbanjary.net/avoided-deforestation-most-favorite-project-of-forest-carbon-offset/</link>
		<comments>http://iipalbanjary.net/avoided-deforestation-most-favorite-project-of-forest-carbon-offset/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 09:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Forest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon offset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deforestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecosecurities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southeast Asia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iipalbanjary.net/?p=1102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent survey of forest carbon offsetting reveals that most buyers rated positive on the projects of avoided deforestation and ecological reforestation.  It about 90% of respondents consider these to be highly desirable or desirable. The survey was involved 141 corporate participants throughout the world. They are participated in the carbon market during February 2009 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://iipalbanjary.net/avoided-deforestation-most-favorite-project-of-forest-carbon-offset/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
